Nowadays people are more prone to obtain a personal car and to be over-reliant on the car as their major and only means of transportation. The consequences associated with this issue is that the higher rate of road accidents and the more globally terrible levels of pollution. Personally, I believe that this issue could be considerably handled by high taxation as well as educational campaigns.
The more drivers on the road, the more crowded the roads become and the more possibility of unexpected and serious road accidents. For instance, in Vietnam, from the industrial revolution, the national economy has been thrust enormously as more Vietnamese people own cars in the wake of a rapid increase in death tolls because of road incidents. Another alarming problem is that more personal cars mean more smog, carbon footprint, and more aggressive sound which contributes to the worse air and noise pollution. This condition destroys the natural environment and consequently be detrimental to human's health.
One possible solution to this problem is for the government to impose higher levies for private cars possession. Accordingly, a person who is tending to own a car should think about having to pay more than 50% compared to the former tax levels. With the fear of losing money, they will select a better choice is to use public transports. Additionally, the local authority should take this issue into more account by conveying more messages about the negative impacts of owning personal cars to raise their awareness of the residents.
In conclusion, becoming an owner of a car could boost personal reputation but pose threats to the environment and others on the roads. Therefore, it is mostly the government's responsibility to inform citizens about the disadvantages and implement appropriate tax rates to completely solve the problem.
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of kolkata 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast 56
- The charts show the sources of the electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The charts show the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
... the roads. Therefore, it is mostly the governments responsibility to inform citizens about...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, consequently, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24915824916 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98314978221 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592592592593 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5828907317 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.923076923 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28876701563 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0972926319319 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886298712035 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16086014293 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072468429248 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.