The most important aim of science should be to improve people’s lives.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
Many people believe that the ultimate goal of science is to enhance and improve human life. I completely agree with this point of view because science has the power to revolutionize society, solve urgent problems, and enhance the well-being of individuals on a global scale.
First, the main reason why science can improve people’s lives is its impact on healthcare. Scientific research has led to remarkable breakthroughs in the field of medicine, leading to the development of life-saving drugs, advanced treatments, and surgical procedures. For example, the discovery and widespread use of antibiotics have revolutionized the treatment of infectious diseases, dramatically reducing mortality rates worldwide. Additionally, the development of vaccines against dangerous diseases has saved countless lives and eliminated or greatly reduced the occurrence of once-deadly diseases. By allocating resources to medical research, science can continue to reduce human diseases and improve overall health outcomes.
Second, science plays an important role in solving social challenges and improving living conditions. Thanks to scientific research in fields such as agriculture, energy, and technology, sustainable solutions to ensure food security, access to clean energy, and efficient infrastructure can be developed. For example, advances in agricultural science have led to increased crop yields, combating hunger, and ensuring food supplies for growing populations. Similarly, scientific innovations in renewable energy have the potential to mitigate climate change and reduce dependence on fossil fuels, thereby improving environmental conditions and promoting a more sustainable future.
In short, I firmly believe that the main purpose of science is to improve human life. This has been shown most clearly through advances in healthcare and contributions to solving problems related to our natural resources and living environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-14 | trpg143 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 89
- The table and charts below give information on the police budget for 2017 and 2018 in one area of Britain The table shows where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main fe 56
- The graph below gives information about the percentage of the population in four Asian countries living in cities from 1970 to 2020 with predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 78
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting the usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or negative development 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, similarly, so, well, for example, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1666.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 276.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.03623188406 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17826946079 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634057971014 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.1458240178 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.153846154 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206556890407 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738690323335 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0583160477485 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129776544979 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417575427089 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.75 12.4159519038 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.