Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying
alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.
Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
In this modern world the variation of diseases has also increased. Now, people are exploring other methods of treatment instead of knocking medical facilities. This essay disagrees, this practice should be encouraged as the caregivers are not professional as well as this may lead to unfortunate deaths.
Many people tend to be entertained more by herbal medicine and practices than modern technologies of medical science. Avoiding the over-uses of drugs along with the fear of surgery are the root causes. Moreover, they often end up meeting clerks who are not professionally qualified enough. This may result in major concerns such as dipping the scope of successful treatment percentages for delay and sometimes generating life long sickness. To cite an example, research has showed that about 60% of herbal professionals are not properly qualified to practice.
On the other hand, diseases are a critical issue. In addition, many sickness requires instant treatment so that it can be cured properly. Cancer is a major example, since the sooner it can be identified, the more chances there to cure it permanently. If a cancer patient waste time visiting clerks for herbal medications, he may face the fatal consequences. Cancer, diabetes, etc are fatal problems they should be treated as early as possible in order to survive. Research from Dhaka Medical College claimed that about 60% of cancer patients die for not identifying it earlier.
In a nutshell, even though natural medication can be beneficial in many scenarios, avoiding technological advanced amenities of medical is not a great idea. As it may natural care givers are not trained and delaying in case of chronic and deadly diseases may lead to death.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-12-08 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 78
- Present a written argument or case to an educated non specialist audience on the following topic Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for 78
- some people think that the best way to run a business is within the family What are tge advantages and disadvantages of a family run business 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun sickness seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much sickness', 'a good deal of sickness'.
Suggestion: much sickness; a good deal of sickness
...ases are a critical issue. In addition, many sickness requires instant treatment so that it c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, so, well, in addition, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23826714801 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88621329134 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599277978339 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0078114104 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.6875 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3125 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912203308693 0.244688304435 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0293311763673 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323621261988 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0576184484624 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478672138182 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.