Recently, the majority of big enterprises run multi-nationally. From my perspective, multinational corporations do not have to take any responsibility to local societies in which they administer for the following reasons.
Apparently, it is undeniable that the appearance of foreign companies in numerous countries already enhances employment in the neighborhood. To demonstrate, when Apple established new showrooms or retail stores in Hanoi, hundreds of local occupation seekers were employed, reducing unemployment and developing standards of living. Furthermore, multi-national firms contribute tremendously to the local community by paying taxes to the locals through the tax system. This amount of money will be purchased for the distribution of social benefits such as medical care or education services. Thus, it would be ridiculous for those businesses to take any further obligation for providing support for the societies where they base their offices.
Additionally, the idea of overseas corporations sacrificing a proportion of their profit to help local people is unreasonable as it is the responsibility of local authorities or the government of that region. They should learn to deal with their own domestic issues instead of calling for aid from abroad firms. Subsequently, those organizations have to make a fortune to survive in this competitive world. If a part of their income is given to charity groups, for instance, to ameliorate local living standards, their priority goal will not be accomplished, leading to their retreat and a great loss to the community.
To sum up, the operation of large enterprises from wealthy nations in less developed countries naturally sparks several positive changes in local life, and it is not their duty to help individuals living around.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62271062271 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35060933874 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9920205992 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.916666667 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189026405939 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0594908877773 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0465413132893 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107673365763 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213005089942 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.