The opportunities that the new technologies brought to our lives has also changed the classic patterns of entertaining and made computer games and movies significant amusement source. However, there is a considerable number of people who think that games and movies which contain violence should be forbidden. By contrast, a great number of people like me believe that this is part of entertainment and not dangerous for users.
Firstly, people who want the prohibition on games mostly emphasize the case that the violence in most games is only limited to virtual worlds and is not possible in real life. As we know, people want what he or she cannot achieve such violence looks attracting to most of the players. Moreover, violence can affect youngsters mind and make them intended to try actions which are in the games and movies in real life. Correspondingly, that kind of action can cause serious troubles for them.
On the other hand, there are millions who watch and play games and movies but has not any psychological problems and troubles with violence. Additionally, it depends on people to use that kind of entertainment sources. Avoiding such content can be (the) more proper solution for who believes that they are dangerous, instead of banning for everyone. Furthermore, there are a lot of games and films designed for relaxation, releasing stress and anxiety. What is more, there is a great number of people who make money from this sector. Ban for games and movies can increase the unemployment rate of society.
To conclude, in spite of the fact that violence in games and movies can cause some problems for some part of society, it depends on people’s choices and mostly out of danger.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, kind of, in spite of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97202797203 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75395767034 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1035506305 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229373591914 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818844479145 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480515965999 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149324633534 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474024689757 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, kind of, in spite of, what is more, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1422.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97202797203 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75395767034 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531468531469 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1035506305 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.571428571 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229373591914 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0818844479145 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480515965999 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149324633534 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0474024689757 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.