In our highly competitive world, some employers value paper qualifications over hands-on experience or personal traits. Despite the fact that there are underlying reasons for this development, I certainly regard it as a negative trend.
To begin with, formal academic qualifications unquestionably play a vital role in the selection and working process. A candidate with professional training is much likely to have in-depth knowledge and appropriate working patterns that can help him smoothly move up the corporate ladder in a company. It can be said that the person eqquiped with formal qualifications will get ahead of his job and contribute within a short space of time to the company's progress. In contrast, there will be arduous training that requires a great deal of recources including time and money given that a non-academic employee has little necessary knowledge and skills.
Nevertheless, this trend will pose a serious threat to our society in general. First, the sole focus on formal qualifications amongst recruiters will coerce numerous school systems to put more emphasis on theoretical knowledge and. As a result, practical skills and moral decorum can probably be pushed to the margin of educational programs, which leads to an inevitable occurence of rigid application of poorly designed curricula and corruption in ethical standards. Second, since personal qualities and life experience are of paramount importance at work, formal qualification that do not show much about these proves incomprehensive and inefficient at the same time. For instance, negative traits such as dishonesty and jeaousy can take a heavy toll in the development of any companies.
In general, there are viable causes for the preference of formal academic qualifications over life experience or personal qualities amongst many employers. However, I believe this is a negative development with those arguments mentioned above.
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that international car free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution others think there are some other ways Discuss both views and give your own opinions 89
- The older generations tend to have very traditional ideas about how people should live think and behave However some people believe that these ideas are not helpful in preparing younger generations for modern life To what extent do you agree or disagree w 50
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with the highest marks while others say they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... little necessary knowledge and skills. Nevertheless, this trend will pose a ser...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, nevertheless, second, so, for instance, in contrast, in general, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55254237288 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15138305638 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4663292601 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272998305084 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903349371589 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659175095644 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177860112755 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654429002555 0.056905535591 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.