Nowadays the use of social media such as facebook, twitter and so on is becoming more popular than one on one conversation. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages.
Technology has revolunized the world of communication. Presently, the trend of face to face interaction is taken over by using communication technology such as social networking sites in the entire globe. Here, this essay intends to discuss the merits of this happening outweigh demerits.
There are numerous benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, social networking sites connect people worldwide in order to develop social, personal and commercial relationship. To demonstrate, it is quite common to make new foreigner friends via chats on social sites. Such sites are also used for setting up commercial dealings with the group of people or enterprises. Hence, the role of social networking websites to avail the different advantages is phenomenal.
Further emphasizing on my view point, communication technology is a boon for people who live far away from their families for their higher education, jobs and business. They can make video and audio calls to stay connected with their kith and kins. Social sites such as Facebook, Whatsapp, Instagram so on also allow people to send messages, chats and e-mails to remain up to date with family members. Taking a real life example into consideration, my brother living in England makes video call everyday and never feels homesickness or disconnected with us while living thousand miles away. Consequently, communication sites are extremely lucrative to bridge the gap between family bonds. On the contrary, it has thorny side too.
To commence with, people have become introvert on account of social networking. Most of youngsters keep themselves engaged with chatting with Facebook friends and they do not spend quality time with their parents. For instance, they spend long hours on social sites and left with no time to share their thoughts and ideas in their day to day life. What is more, the addiction of spending long time using mobile and computer for communication leads to many health concerns such as weak optics, back pain, head ache and many more.
To recapitulate, undeniably, networking for social talks has few negatives. However, the positives of web communication outweigh its darker side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntire globe. Here, this essay intends to discuss the merits of this happening out...
^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...its. There are numerous benefits of this phenomena. First and foremost, social n...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...different advantages is phenomenal. Further emphasizing on my view point, communica...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 496, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ther living in England makes video call everyday and never feels homesickness or disconn...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mence with, people have become introvert on account of social networking. Most of...
^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the youngsters') or simply say ''Most youngsters''.
Suggestion: Most of the youngsters; Most youngsters
...overt on account of social networking. Most of youngsters keep themselves engaged with chatting w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, hence, however, if, so, while, for instance, such as, on the contrary, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 344.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35465116279 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8727520193 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610465116279 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.3487024027 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.1 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15120722487 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456481552042 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377774567776 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889090836964 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376149006664 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.