People have different views on whether it is beneficial for the investment be used for building new fast trains between cities. It is clear to me that the budget should be spent on improving existing transportation infrastructure first.
On the one hand, some people believe that the government need to spend a huge amount of money on developing the high speed transportation in order to cut the time of travel between two cities. For example, after fast trains have constructed in Taiwan, it is easier for traveler to go to KaoHsiung from Taipei. In the past, people used to spend 6 to 7 hours arriving KaoHsiung, yet it only takes 1.5 hours now. Nevertheless, the new railway lines can also bring the money for the government on the basis that the economy will be prosper than before. Tourism is one of the latest commercial patterns that can earn money from the travelers, the more convenient the cities are, the more tourists will be attracted, which in turn makes more revenue.
On the other hand, although there are some benefits on constructing high speed railway, I believe that there still have some problems the government need to measure first. The public transportation is one of the most important part of the cities so I think it is necessary to spend the budget on improving the buses or metro that the cities have already had. For instance, some buses in Taipei are old and some are even not functional, it is urgent that the city planner must replace and furnish the transport so that the citizens can have a pleasant travel experience.
In conclusion, although the development of the high speed railway is important, I believe that the replacement and the improvement of public transport are more necessary than others.
- Governments Should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is positive or negative development? 56
- Some people claim that not enough of wastes from homes is recycled. They say that that only way to increase recycling for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste? 56
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and gi 61
- The diagram below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...can have a pleasant travel experience. In conclusion, although the development ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, so, still, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86241610738 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75484553307 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496644295302 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.9547359821 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.727272727 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0909090909 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369294240107 0.244688304435 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13447723549 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0561736444357 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217186469874 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059652176292 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 50.2224549098 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.