Online classes make conventional classes unnecessary. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The educational system from all around the world is being beneficial towards the development of technology and the internet. New study ways and methods have been created, especially ways which use technology and the internet as a platform. With all the perks people could gain through e-learning, online classes have exploded. Some believe that physical classrooms have become irrelevant. In my opinion, it is almost impossible that e-learning could completely replace conventional classes.
First and foremost, not all things can be learned through a screen, knowledge could be limited for subjects which involve heavy physical interactions and lab equipment, such as chemistry, engineering, etc. Furthermore, online classes contain more possibilities of distractions as learners have access to the internet in an unsupervised situation. Moreover, there are elements of classroom dynamics that a virtual environment can not provide, for example, the interactive activities and live discussions in a physical, conventional classroom can help learners to improve their interpersonal skills and they can also learn from each other.
Nonetheless, e-learning also brings us incredible perks which can be denied, especially when we are having geographical boundaries nowadays. Also, web-based classes help learners overcome time constraints, which is particularly helpful for people in rural and remote areas where schools and teachers are scarce. Since 2020 and to today’s day, the global pandemic has caused humanity serious loss and inconvenience.
In conclusion, online learning is indeed a practical and brilliant creation, but it is definitely not able to replace physical classrooms and face to face classes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-27 | mardanpour | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-24 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-17 | Kha Linh | 61 | view |
| 2024-12-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 73 | view |
- the table compares the production of carbon dioxide in five countries in 2017 and 2018 67
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castell n in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show changes in the Spanish city of Castell n in recent times Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie chart graph below the percentage of usage comparison between 2015 and 2020 in terms of going into bars pubs
- The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996 1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al classrooms and face to face classes.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84126984127 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1081233629 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.4757784614 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.666666667 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0883250331745 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0350902188761 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467135278816 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.052306674757 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0162641213365 0.056905535591 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.59 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.