The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities today is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work, education or shopping.
It is certainly true that the major problem which cities now are facing with is traffic, the result of the increasing volume of vehicles on the streets. Although reducing the demand of people’s daily routine for work, education or shopping could prevent traffic, it seems to me that this is not the sole solution to arrest this issue.
Thanks to the Internet, the incredible technology development of human, people no more face geographical and time barriers as they used to in the previous eras. A businessman, for instance, could run his business, communicate with partners in other counterparts without being at a far-away location or different time zone. Likewise, with interacting teaching, students do not need to attend class in the lecture hall but still acquire full knowledge. Simultaneously, online shopping offers a variety of choices for customers. In other words, without having people travel to fulfill their demand, the application of this technology has put a good impact on traffic matters.
Nevertheless, the lack of freedom and social communication are its noticeable drawbacks. In addition, there have been others practical methods potentially addressing the traffic-related issue recently. The use of public transport provides a typical example. If the cities’ authorities enhance the use of buses, trains or the development of not road based transport such as sky trams or subways, instead of private vehicles, not only will the traffic congestion be dealt but also people will still be capable of sustaining their social interaction as usual.
In conclusion, I admit the importance of decreasing the need for traveling from home to workplace, schools, and shops to solve the current traffic situation. Besides, I do think that there are more acceptable alternative measures to reduce jams on the roads.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-09 | chetan kakollu | 67 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | chetan kakollu | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-25 | Arman Abdullah | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | thaivu220802 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-25 | thaivu220802 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answer and in 89
- Task 1 the three charts below show the percentage of the method which students travel to school in Britain Australia and Singapore Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer.The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make co 84
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. Italso predicts figures for 2025.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makecomparisons where relevant. 84
- Happiness is considered very important in life.Why is it difficult to define?What factors are important in achieving happiness?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, still, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37370242215 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03463166727 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650519031142 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0211008261 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.461538462 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.53846153846 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269960358856 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743530887175 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0707291653731 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159939758329 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711905945588 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.97 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.