It is insisted that traffic congestions could be solved only if there were less necessities of commuting to work, study or shopping areas. Even though this is quite appealing dilemma, I believe that the majority of people may not choose to simply stay at home and do their work or study online because of social and economic consequences they can face as a result.
There are obvious reasons why it could be not preferable option. First, people are excessively accustomed to traditional way of working or studying. For example, employees who usually commute to offices can find it difficult to make face-to-face contacts with their coworkers in order to share their experiences. This can not only affect tgeor performance but also their job prospects. Furthermore, it seems that there may be less social interaction with people. Doing tasks online while staying at home can make us feel isolated from society which can really affect our relationships with people outside. Consequently, we can start fearing public exposure in the long run.
However, serious economic consequences might be faced as well. One of the issues related to this proposal is that businesses such as restaurants can suffer from lack of people in the streets. As people who are regular visitors of restaurants could shift to online work or study, these businesses run the risk of losing profits and going into bankruptcy in the long term. This can contribute to the loss of jobs in the hospitality industry , hence an increase in joblessness. Moreover, most of the office buildings would become useless if employess turned into online working. These empty buildings can serve no purpose, leading to waste of resources.
In conclusion, despite the fact that the given idea is appealing, it appears to me that this can in fact cause social and economic challenges.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun necessities is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ions could be solved only if there were less necessities of commuting to work, study...
^^^^
Line 5, column 439, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...loss of jobs in the hospitality industry , hence an increase in joblessness. Moreo...
^^
Line 5, column 514, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
.... Moreover, most of the office buildings would become useless if employess turned...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1059602649 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76723964746 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612582781457 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5213324723 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.375 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112655666448 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0346861364018 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406871727958 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06556166058 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.048762994989 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.