Organized tours to remote areas and communities are increasingly popular. Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and the environment?
It seems that a prevalent trend in tourism in recent years is the increasing popularity of visits to far-off places. I opine that given this tendency would benefit the residents in those destinations, it may do harm to the locality.
On the one hand, inhabitants in the sites where tourists come could gain economic and cultural advantages. For starters, there will be more revenues coming to the places. As travelers come and stay at the tourist sites, they will certainly demand some basic services such as accommodation and catering. This can help local residents earn more money by providing such services, which in turn boost their living standards. In addition, it is the cultural exchange that inhabitants there can enjoy. Visitors nationwide and well as worldwide can introduce their customs to local people and at the same time learn the local’s by means of their visits. The process facilitates international understanding among people and helps boost love and passion for people in general.
Granted, excessive tourist activities can cause damage to the sites’ surroundings. Surveys have shown that almost all places of interest are now under great criticism for the omnipresence of litter. Owing to this, many once-popular places have been turned back on by visitors. Moreover, when there are more people flocking to a place, the demand for transportation escalates accordingly. More flights or transport routes are established to accommodate this growing need, meaning that the volume of traffic also increases, and the definitive repercussion is the deterioration of the air quality.
In conclusion, it is my belief that this trend of tourism defers considerable merits on local people, but gives rise to environmental degradation. Therefore, it is of paramount import that the powers that be should take appropriate action to maximize the gains and minimize the losses.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-23 | chips_0506 | 81 | view |
| 2023-03-26 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 89 | view |
| 2022-08-29 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 73 | view |
- Teleworking has been on the increase in recent years Do youy think this is positive and negative development 56
- Influence of human beings on the world s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 89
- Advertising discourages people from being different by making them want to be and to look the same Do you agree or disagree Answer 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in addition, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35451505017 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96337301472 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625418060201 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7877104137 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6875 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12369493624 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0367383312058 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394049395004 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0623690164443 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264988758461 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.