People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some individuals claim that global citizens these days possess superior living conditions than they did in the past. Personally, I partly agree with this opinion due to the following elaborations.
There are several reasons for the belief that people in the current world have superior living standards. As the world has become more globalised and progressed, numerous medical breakthroughs have been recorded throughout history. With these transformations, scientists have devised new treatments that can cure various deadly diseases and therefore safeguard millions of lives. For instance, as the world faced the fatal COVID-19 virus in 2019, leading scientists worldwide successfully rolled out the optimal vaccines to curb the spread of the virus. As a result, medical advancements in recent years have considerably enhanced human health, reflecting the better quality of life.
Nevertheless, the critics of the abovementioned opinion argue that the quality of life has been detrimentally affected due to the implications of overpopulation. The sharp increase in the number of residents has accelerated the figures for private vehicles, which can exacerbate environmental problems stemming from the amount of carbon dioxide emissions released into the atmosphere. Another consequence of overpopulation deterring humans from advancing better living conditions is the limited access to education. As the number of Vietnamese public schools is inadequate to meet the rapid growth of the population, thousands of secondary students are forced to attend a highly competitive entrance examination for high schools. Candidates who cannot conquer the exam may undergo years of vocational training, inflicting emotional and psychological wounds on those young children.
In conclusion, while I contend that our living conditions have improved considerably compared to the past, I argue that the quality of life is still poor in some aspects. Without appropriate managerial practices for the rapidly rising populations, various problematic issues will emerge as obstacles to reducing the contemporary living standards of individuals.
- Some people think that children should aim to their best at what they doing Others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- The most effective way to solve the current traffic and pollution problems in cities is to encourage people to move from the suburbs or the countryside into the city centre To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Films were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- Some people focus on news in their country while others think it is more important to be aware of international news Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In many countries there is not enough recycling for waste materials e g paper can glass What are the reasons of this situation What can be done to encourage recycling 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... than they did in the past. Personally, I partly agree with this opinion due to t...
^
Line 7, column 22, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...young children. In conclusion, while I contend that our living conditions have...
^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...oved considerably compared to the past, I argue that the quality of life is still...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1829.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18082345898 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645161290323 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 568.8 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.181224679 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.642857143 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154166441793 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509335488015 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466229097927 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0874382282792 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260965637888 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 12.4159519038 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.99 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.