People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion

In the recent era, people are now more concerned about environmental pollution which is one of the major issues all around the world. The environmentalist thinks that burning fuel of cars and other types of vehicles is the main reason for enhancing the environmental problems. Therefore, to resolve this issue cost of fuel should be increased. In this case, I think this measure can not be the only solution to solve this matter.

Firstly, the government should make public transportation more convenient and efficient so that people feel more comfortable using public transport. As a consequence, the number of personal cars or vehicles will be decreased. For example, in Luxemburg, after thinking about environmental pollution, the government takes the decision to make public transport free for everyone. As a result, the number of cars on the road decreases a lot which is proved environmentally friendly. Moreover, the governing body should encourage people to use public transport through a different medium, so that they can understand the importance of it.

Secondly, the government can motivate people to use the chargeable cars and buses which popularity is increasing day by day. Because people do not have to utilize fossil fuel to drive cars or vans, whereas, it will be more climate-friendly. Thirdly, the government should develop the underground railway system so that more people can use this system. For instance, in the UK due to the fact of an underground train, the number of private cars decline a lot in contemporary times.

In conclusion, raising the price of fuel is not an accomplishment, to sum up, all the points above from my side, I think the government should find out the alternative ways which will be more friendly for the environment.

Votes
Average: 6.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, whereas, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15570934256 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10108354426 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543252595156 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7551861554 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347962604967 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118477726265 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594874620324 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206012473249 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361835349505 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.