People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion

In the recent era, environmental pollution is a contentious issue all around the world. The environmentalist thinks that burning fuel of cars and other types of vehicles is the main reason for enhancing the environmental problems. Therefore, to resolve this issue cost of fuel should be increased. In this case, I think this measure can not be the only solution to solve this matter.

Firstly, the government should make public transportation more convenient and efficient so that people feel more comfortable using public transport. As a consequence, the number of personal cars or vehicles will be decreased. For example, in Luxemburg, after thinking about environmental pollution, the government takes the decision to make public transport free for everyone. As a result, the number of cars on the road decreases a lot which is proved environmentally friendly. Moreover, the governing body should encourage people to use public transport through a different medium, so that they can understand the importance of it.

Secondly, the government should take other potential measures to save the environment such as rules and regulations should enforce strictly so that the number of upcoming vehicles on the road will decrease. For instance, the local authority should be careful about the performance of the driver when they are given a driving test. Furthermore, the officials can motivate people to use the chargeable cars and buses which they have not to utilize fossil fuel to drive cars or vans, since, it will be more climate-friendly.

In conclusion, raising the price of fuel is not a solution, to sum up, all the points above from my side, I think the government should search out more alternative ways which will be more friendly for the environment.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the recent era, environmental pollution is a contentious...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2323943662 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0797683711 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542253521127 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9091843056 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.307692308 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1538461538 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336524876454 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118409022721 0.084324248473 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630649936996 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200161537615 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0347007029386 0.056905535591 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.