Despite the achievements of women everywhere, we still face considerable barriers to full participation at work. I am totally in favour of this idea and this essay will discuss three prime factors that are responsible for the failure of achievement of the sex fairness in the workplace with relevant examples.
Firstly, unhelpful stereotypes play a significant role in generating gender inequalities. To illustrate, in engineering industries, the proportions of females are markedly lower compared to males because females from a young age opt out of subjects such as maths and science, which remai...
- The chart shows components of GDP in the UK from 1992 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. 73
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing and medicine.Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people, rich countries are stealing from poor 97
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- As child obesity becomes a serious health issue in today’s society, some people feel that TV commercials advertising junk food aimed at kids should not be shown before 9pm.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 74
Essay evaluation report
draw mistaken idea that
draw a mistaken idea that
draw mistaken ideas that
lack of role models in the work place prevent females from competing with male counterparts.
lack of role models in the work place prevents females from competing with male counterparts.
It operates an encouragement to other women in a work place as they have the authority to decide and negotiate on issues that affect them
Description: 'they,them' refers to what? Be sensitive to use pronouns.
something like:
It operates an encouragement to other women who have the authority to decide and negotiate on issues in a work place ...
//here who is clear
Sentence: To illustrate, in engineering industries, the proportions of females are markedly lower compared to males because females from a young age opt out of subjects such as maths and science, which remain fundamental for a technical career.
Error: maths Suggestion: math
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 361 350
No. of Characters: 1929 1500
No. of Different Words: 223 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.359 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.343 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.984 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 141 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 116 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 84 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 65 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.562 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.108 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.688 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.291 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.556 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.04 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r women in a work place as they have the authority to decide and negotiate on iss...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48476454294 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05941602211 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 626.4 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4195041623 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1875 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0928037134055 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0309177200305 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0274561533255 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0486453163828 0.151304729494 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107523120736 0.056905535591 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.11 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.