Nowadays, due to the consumption of processed food many health related concer are rising. Some people, therefore argue that, through education this problem can be ameliorated, while there are others who are of the view that this is an unachievable task. I find it more logical to endorse the latter view, the reasons for which will be enumerated in this essay.
On the one hand, supporters of the prior viewpoint might say that, education is one of the best ways to tackle this problem. This is because people nowadays have no idea about their daily intake of carbohydrates or fats. Both these are present in higher quantities in junk foods, leading to problems such as obesity and inadequate development. This will also cause health problems I the future. For example, recent researches have shown that, too much consumption of processed food will lead to problems such as liver or heart failure in the later life of a person. So through campaigns or initiatives these problems can be thwarted.
However, I believe that this is not a practical approach. By simply imparting education the consumption of junk food will not decrease. Nowadays majority of people in our society are well-educated. They are all aware about the consequences of these problems, yet that are too lazy or ignorant to change their lifestyles. These people find it more easy to consume convenience food rather than following a healthy diet. For instance, a bust manager will find it more easy to grab a packet of instant noodles rather than to prepare dosa or chappathi at home. So in these cases education will be ineffective. A better solution is to impose high taxes on junk food and make healthy food more affordable and more easily available.
In conclusion, I believe that education alone is highly unlikely to reduce the consumption of junk food, a better solution is to impose high taxes and make good food readily available.
- Many doctors are concerned about the high use of computer games by children and young people What mental and physical problems may arise from excessive use of these games How could these problems be reduced 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 67
- The table below shows changes in the numbers of residents cycling to work in different areas of the UK between 2001 and 2011 61
- A government has a responsibility to its citizens to ensure their safety Therefore some people think that the government should increase spending on defence but spend less on social benefits To what extent do you agree 91
- The table below shows the results of a 20 year study into why adults in the UK attend arts events Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 52, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun health seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much health', 'a good deal of health'.
Suggestion: much health; a good deal of health
...ue to the consumption of processed food many health related concer are rising. Some people,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'cases'' or 'case's'?
Suggestion: cases'; case's
... dosa or chappathi at home. So in these cases education will be ineffective. A better...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95962732919 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72823744939 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2550893953 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7222222222 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287402187392 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.086586991308 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428475271763 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164142483101 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451506039138 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.19 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.