It is irrefutable that from the past few years scientific research has been held in a hastily manner. However, some people think that the time and money which use in such researches is a waste. While, there are few benefits for doing scientific research, I would argue that there are other issues needs to be resolve.
Firstly, currently country is facing several problems such as lack of employment, hospital infrastructure, shortage of food resources and many more. Keeping this in mind, some individuals believe that instead of wasting money and time in doing lot of scientific findings government must take requisite steps for such growing concerns. Moreover, improving job opportunities would make more positive impact to the nation rather than scientific research. For instance, as per the recent survey conducted by education department, 28% of graduates are still unemployed and they are facing financial issues in a large amount.
Secondly, scarce of food availability has also played a huge negative impact to the nation. In addition, government should utilise income in terms of importing food resources and making agriculture equipments available. For example, if there is the availability of more agriculture equipments this might help farmers to cultivate more and more food grains in the home itself rather than purchasing it from overseas countries.
To conclude, inspite of doing several scientific studies, government authority must look into the other aspects which country is facing and must take some vital moves to resolve it.
- Some people say that every human being can create art for example painting Others think only the people born with the ability can create art discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- some people believe that it is important to give gifts and presents to friends and family to show that we are care about them others think that there are better ways to show affection to them discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The graph below gives information about the number of cases of diarrhea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 73
- The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 2012 78
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a huge manner" with adverb for "huge"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...years scientific research has been held in a huge manner. However, some people think that the ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...benefits for doing scientific research, i would argue that there are other issues...
^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'findings'' or 'finding's'?
Suggestion: findings'; finding's
...ney and time in doing lot of scientific findings government must take requisite steps fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...lability of more agriculture equipments then this might help farmers to cultivate mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39344262295 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81468774089 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3101673387 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208551652986 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784926641449 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915318780293 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125287024242 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877230441691 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a huge manner" with adverb for "huge"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...years scientific research has been held in a huge manner. However, some people think that the ti...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...benefits for doing scientific research, i would argue that there are other issues...
^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'findings'' or 'finding's'?
Suggestion: findings'; finding's
...ney and time in doing lot of scientific findings government must take requisite steps fo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...lability of more agriculture equipments then this might help farmers to cultivate mo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 244.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39344262295 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81468774089 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606557377049 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3101673387 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.636363636 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1818181818 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.7272727273 7.06120827912 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208551652986 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784926641449 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0915318780293 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125287024242 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877230441691 0.056905535591 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.