Nowadays in 4.0 industry era, technology is becoming a crucial part of human life. It is argued that most of the children's time was spent on smartphones and in my opinion, it is a detrimental development followed by serious consequences.
In the era of connecting things, the smartphone, which is one of the most fascinating inventions of human, is indisposable. Also, children in the present, have more possibility to access to the device due to the fact that every parent has one. Another factor, all the information in terms of education and entertainment can be opened in a smartphone which enhances the chance of children using them.
However, according to my consideration, it is a negative trend and leads to significant predicaments. First factor to be mentioned, smartphones can affect children's health in bad ways, especially eyesight. It is an electronic device that ejects blue light harming eyes and weakening the eyesight of young humans. Moreover, the time sticking to the device mess up the favorable timetable for them.
Another crucial aspect, the proportion of time spent on this device by children can islolate them from real life. Besides studying, and entertaining, children should take time to participate in outdoor activities which enhance their flexibility, social relationship, and natural connection. It should be the most suitable way for children to develop in every aspect.
Most importantly, the content on Internet and electronic devices is various and its sources are intangible and out of control. The world has witnessed many cases illustrating how bad smartphones impact people, let alone children. For instance, in 2019 there was the negative trend called Blue Whale which appeal children to commit suicide. There could have been fewer repercussions if adults can control the time spent on smartphones and the internet by young ones.
A great deal of ideas says the smartphone is the most fascinating tool for children to develop and follow the word Innovation. It cannot be denied that plus points of the device are available which enhances methods for children to explore the knowledge entertain in different ways and grow perspectively. However the issue is only good in the short term while failing to recognize the long-term influence like mental and physical impacts. Therefore, according to opinions mentioned above, I strongly believe using smartphones too frequently can result in detrimental effects on children.
In conclusion, the time using smartphones should be limited and controlled by parents if they do not intend to have their children harmed.
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 84
- The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after five years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting t 78
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...phones and the internet by young ones. A great deal of ideas says the smartphon...
^^^
Line 11, column 306, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... different ways and grow perspectively. However the issue is only good in the short ter...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2208.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 413.0 315.596192385 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34624697337 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00759922177 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554479418886 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7652942471 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.19047619048 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.38176352705 160% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181338570076 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053257532128 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424572255943 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092998895533 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303474789186 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.