In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in. What are the reasons for this? How can people research this?
An influx of people are seemingly intriguing in exploring the origin of the house or erection they live in. This practice can be justified for rational reasons as well as multiple methodologies to conduct.
Admittedly, there are numerous reasons why people are inclined to do research about their accommodation. Firstly, having a demonstrated knowledge on the structure and design of the house is conducive for renovation or update. To be more accurate, this movement can lessen tragic accidents when taking a transformation. For example, if people wish to maintain an old house, they must have to do a research for its base or structure. Thereby, this can avoid the building being collapsed leading to multiple fatal accidents. Secondly, delving into the history of the house can support the owners to acknowledge more about the superstitious aspects of the building. This can be explained by the fact that the land in which their accommodations are constructed may have experienced religious activity or hidden enigmas. Therefore, owners catching up with this information can make a decision not to live here or take actions to eliminate these bad omen as soon as feasible.
Along with countless grounds of this phenomenon, there also have been tremendous methodologies supporting people to take a brief overall of their construction. In terms of the design and structure, house owners can look forward to hiring engineers who are equipped with specialist knowledge for a field trip to the house for the accuracy conclusion. Regarding the superstition, owners can take surveys on the neighbours who have been living in this area for a long time. They probably have treasured information about the previous owners or the events happening with the house.
To sum up, there is no doubt that a throng of people are becoming curious in finding out about the origin of their house. This movement can be explained by numerous rationales along with possible approaches to conduct.
- The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 395, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...tain an old house, they must have to do a research for its base or structure. Thereby, thi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, look, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, no doubt, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18125 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96834865708 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540625 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6258484033 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.384400245638 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121881715952 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398655522146 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236637032488 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620037851649 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.