In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this

In this contemporary era, in several countries, knowing the history of the properties has been interesting for the owners. In my opinion, various reasons are affecting people to think about the past times. I am also convinced that they can enquire about these buildings from different resources.
It is my view that what absorbs people is the sense of connection. To put it in another way, people find it intriguing to be knowledgeable in possessing’ history as they feel closer to that house. Moreover, not only does it enhance the connection with ancient people but also it enriches individuals’ curiosity. Therefore, numerous people have a personal interest in history and the history of their owners gives them an opportunity to fulfil this personal passion. For example, an ancient building in Kave Street was for one of the king’s ministers which resulted in a written book by its owner, owing to research and gaining information about that building and the past.
I further believe that people can augment their knowledge by enquiring about the elderly of that neighbourhood and the municipality plays a substantial role as well. In addition, some online websites can assist people in this field. For instance, the public can search for the roots of constructed palaces and their reasons on different websites. Although people should ensure that those sites are trustworthy, rarely does it happen that the government’s sites share wrong information.
To conclude, augmenting the connection with possess and their personal interest brings about research about the history of that building. From my perspective, the public can enquire from the elderly and use the municipalities’ websites to raise their awareness about the property.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in addition, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1475.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32490974729 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96217250977 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563176895307 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 450.0 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1321547318 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.357142857 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361381743523 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119637779797 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047277481894 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215594806581 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602031378893 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.