In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a
range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. For today’s world, which system is appropriate?
Some secondary schools provide a specific subject to prepare students' career, and that continues to be a hotly debated in some respects. I Believe that applying a wide range of interdisciplinary is more beneficial, which I will explain below.
Firstly, various subjects allow students to have a better future career. In the class where students can determine the most-liked subject, they interested in. It might be said that students have helped by the school for creating their career. After all, they will study the essential skills and knowledge from the school that can accommodate them for pursuing their desired job. For Example, the students who want to be a doctor, of course, need to master Biology, Mathematics, Physics, and Chemist subjects. I believe that more doctors are succeeding now, after taking a class in different lessons. Moreover, a variety of subject is needed to socialize with the environment. This is because, it is required specific skills such as problem-solving, analyzing and discussion. When students find the difficulties, they will be easier to resolve it.
While it may be correct that particular subject can give a big opportunity to reach a peak of a career quickly, it still appears to be the case, however, that broad range of subject is necessary, not only to create better future but also to help students for solving a problem in society.
Overall, I feel that a wide range of the interdisciplinary program is more appropriate in the schools. By the reason, this can assist students to develop particular skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-15 | rednivaralat | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-07 | elveslord77 | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows thefts per thousand cars in four countriesbetween 1990 and 1999. 84
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India 50
- Do you agree that money is the only motivation at work why people prefer working in the same company for many years? 67
- The graph below depicts information about British Emigration to selecteddestinations between 2004 and 2007. 84
- no 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, still, while, after all, for example, i feel, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1325.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19607843137 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9771034487 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572549019608 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2505525223 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6428571429 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171154609303 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0582472448132 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515796085621 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117969074411 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483073536989 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.