Some people believe that a few numbers of contemporary artists gain more money than they deserve to. In another word, they believe that governments must try to change the current injustice situation to a utopia. As well as I am concerned, I suggest the more fans an artist has, the more money he earns and in this way, the government can't regulate the taste of the audience.
Obviously, in an open economic system in which the government does not pay or help different groups of businesses directly, it wouldn't be possible to ask the artists or even audience to change their taste. For instance, a wealthy individual buys a piece of art which is over-priced. As it is a fair deal among two sides, nobody can try to stop this process.
On the other hand, artworks, in general, aren't like many other products that you could offer an exact amount of money to purchase or sell. It seems that governments can't make a rule related to a field which is a creative activity. Furthermore, the question is how can we fix a system of payment to a job that tries to be out of any boxes? Moreover, any kind of steps by the government due to aid to the art society seems to be vague. As there must be a way to know how much time and effort an artist spent to produce his artwork.
To sum up, the idea of supporting the artists by governments is brilliant but when it comes to regulations, by the system, it doesn't seem to be logical
- It is better to travel abroad to visit different countries when you are younger rather than when you are older 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?The ability to maintain friendship with a small number of people over a long period of time is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily.Use specific reasons and exa 90
- Some people choose friends who are different from themselves. Others choose friends who are similar to themselves. Compare the advantages of having friends who are different from you with the advantages of having friends who are similar to you. Which kind 76
- Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands, others like to eat at home. Which do you prefer? Give reasons and examples to support your choice. 70
- TPO 52 integrated 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 335, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e earns and in this way, the government cant regulate the taste of the audience. Ob...
^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...erent groups of businesses directly, it wouldnt be possible to ask the artists or even ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...n the other hand, artworks, in general, arent like many other products that you could...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hase or sell. It seems that governments cant make a rule related to a field which is...
^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...comes to regulations, by the system, it doesnt seem to be logical
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, in general, kind of, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1158.0 1615.20841683 72% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4030418251 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58687619825 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593155893536 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.663993268 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.75 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165974117052 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562487700235 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0335019748682 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943453574721 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350162565532 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.24 12.4159519038 66% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.58950901804 86% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 78.4519038076 57% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.