The ability to create the art has been a subject of many debates. There are people who believe artistic ability is not confined or specific to certain individuals. Others, however, think it is hereditary or innate. In my opinion, every human being is born with a distinct talent but not everyone is able to demonstrate an artistic flair. This essay intends to analyze both sides of the argument before a conclusion is reached.
Everyone is able to produce the art. It is part of human quality. But, to create an artistic work, a person needs so much practice and experience. Moreover, Creativity doesn't grow naturally into a person. It needs how to do a job and deal with a situation successfully. Thus, artistic skill requires dedication and a lot of hard work.
However, the genes, that we inherit from our parents, play a decisive role in determining our aptitude. To illustrate, Mozart, who was a great classical composer and musician, showed prodigious ability from his early childhood. He was able to compose from the age of five and perform before the high ranking officials of his society. Another example, Homayon shajarian, the most well-known Persian classical singer whose euphonious voice is supernatural, was born in a music dedicated family. Scientific studies have already proved the individual variations in talent across different domains very much depend on genetic influence. In addition, variation among individuals make sense when we have scientists in different fields. In other words, If a person is good at something, it doesn't mean he can be good at everything. Even in the classroom, a student may have natural ability in math but he may not show the same talent for art. Therefore, people who are born in families having an exceptional talent in a special domain are more likely to be intelligent in that area.
In conclusion, the significant role of genetic inheritance in generating high level of artistic ability is irrefutable. Practice can help the person at lower level but it is ineffective at higher level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 169, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ce and experience. Moreover, Creativity doesnt grow naturally into a person. It needs ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...s, If a person is good at something, it doesnt mean he can be good at everything. Even...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03539823009 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86978656731 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59587020649 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5114387773 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.5909090909 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4090909091 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31818181818 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188023541337 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482950586347 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0496168805943 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104867890982 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408892979769 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.