Some people believe that children should be banned from using their phones during the school day. Others believe that children should be allowed to use their phones.
It would be argued by some that should block students who using smarts phone in the school. In my opinion, however, students should have the right to phones in school.
On the one hand, there are a number of reasons why some believe that banned from their phones all of the day. The first reason is to distract and spend a larger amount of time on play games or chat online with friends. Another reason is to get lower grades day by day and excessive consumption of phones make he or she feels failing health lead to suffering from various health issues. A case in point, Ly is my friend, she always plays games and chats online with her friend on a daily basis lead to she makes more errors in test and she feels suffer from boredom and stress every day.
On the other hand, I would argue that should have the freedom to use the smarts phone because students would develop essential skills on the internet. Besides, the students will learn how to deal with difficult situations more effectively in their life. From experience, she or he can achieve better academic results in the test. For example, My cousin often learns distance learning programs and he has more opportunities to get a well-paid job to be better prepared for their future career in the university in the future.
In conclusion, although some people think that students should not use their phones, I personally believe that students should be allowed to use phones in school.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-16 | chungoclan2004 | 61 | view |
- Task 1 The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 70
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national andinternational fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national andinternati
- The line graph shows information about the salary players of three sports received on a yearly basis measured in dollars over a period of 31 years from 1970 to 2000 87
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r of the cost was a breakdown in 2019. Overall It is clear that the number of p...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...significantly, during the period show. As can be seen that from the table, the ...
^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... export was rose between 0.5 million and 1.5 over the whole 10 year period. Tu...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 1.5 over the whole 10 year period. Turning to the remaining, the amount of ...
^^
Line 4, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...4%, respectively, over the period show.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1003.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84541062802 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74083818996 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545893719807 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7392095026 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1818181818 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36363636364 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0462617402867 0.215688989381 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0222460411701 0.103423049105 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027492255112 0.0843802449381 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0297798129858 0.15604864568 19% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0156368346637 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.