It is clear to see that artificial intelligence has now reached into almost every area of our lives and this phenomenon is believed only going to grow. However, despite repeated praise for AI’s achievement, some critics express acute anxiety about the possibility that one day AI will outstrip human being. In my opinion, wonderful as AI seems, entrusting our future to AI is too risky.
On the one hand, it cannot be denied that AI has been playing a significant role in this changing world. In factories of the famous car company Honda, almost every step of car making is done by giant robots where a systematic AI is implemented, and the defective rate is likely to drop to nil, contributing to a higher effectiveness and efficiency while saving both raw materials and human resources. AI technology has also been proven leading to a safer life. AI-supported Voice Control, Forward Collision Mitigation, Land Departure Warning system in new vehicles are designed to mitigate the risk of distraction, inattention and blind-spots so that drivers are more capable of dealing with various road affairs.
However, I believe it is through rose-coloured spectacles that most advocates look at the development of AI. Perhaps the most obvious impact is the shrinking employment rate. Although the use of robots may require employers to create a few job opportunities for professional technicians, thousands of manual workers are faced with layoffs. This fact is likely to result in horrendous pressure on the labour market and, moreover, a tendency to seduce the young generation into studying IT while depressing those who opt out. In the long term, an over-centralised talent market is certain to happen and impede social development in other fields. In addition, it is by no means acceptable that a moral issue in AI, though unnoticed temporarily, can be ignored. Today most AI research is designed and conducted by private organisations, while governments are generally absent from their roles of supervisor, failing to put any relevant law or set of regulations into effect ever. In another word, the direction of future AI is solely decided by certain researchers’ willingness, and the public are under no legislative protection if those who design AI lose their conscience and are going to control human life by manipulating their creature.
To conclude, AI is likely to be a suspect trigger for social instability, and AI-related research should be put under more strict supervision and control by the governments and the public before it is put into general practice.
- 'Prevention is better than cure'.Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment to spending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 84
- Topic: Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks, others say that they should accept people of all ages, even if they did not do well. Discuss both views and give your own opinions. 89
- Topic Many people say that universities should only offer to young students with high marks others say that they should accept people of all ages even if they did not do well Discuss both views and give your own opinions 96
- Human activity has had negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe that actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both the views and give your opinion? 89
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 13, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ulating their creature. To conclude, AI is likely to be a suspect trigger for...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, while, in addition, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1961722488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06870198077 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 176.041082164 147% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617224880383 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 697.5 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.6564884972 49.4020404114 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.75 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.125 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0813010005918 0.244688304435 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0289285702242 0.084324248473 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377485496865 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0558103710222 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461969771979 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.