Nowadays, it can be seen that countries are investing a huge proportion of public funds in developing spectacular art statues, as many people believe that these reflect our rich historical culture resulting in boosting tourism activities. However, many others oppose this idea stating that there are numerous other hot issues that need to be addressed first. I am in discord with the given statement and think that country's economy and public needs should be prioritized above all other factors.
It is an undeniable fact that a large percentage of the country's population is under the threat of rising poverty. There are many people who are homeless and are unable to meet their basic needs. Moreover, the unemployment rate is rising dramatically causing dangerous chaos among youngsters. For example, several studies revealed that every year our youngsters either commit suicide or get engulfed in various criminal activities due to lack of job opportunities. Furthermore, the development of public school infrastructure along with technically sound healthcare systems is the need of the hour. Hence, higher authorities should channelize the majority of their funds in introducing new job opportunities and improving public properties.
On the contrary, the development of historical art paintings not only enhances the country's beauty but also adds to its popularity at global levels. The people feel confident and happy seeing the adventures of art miracles. Moreover, traditional art as a whole survives as an indispensable part of society.
Also, this adds to the economy by the flourishing of the tourism industry. For instance, more visitors would choose a destination loaded with beautiful artworks.
To conclude, every year a large monetary share is dedicated to the artistic beauty of a country. The views on whether to support or disagree with this investment vary largely. Although stupendous art sculptures memorize us of our old heritage, in my personal view, the practical issues linked to public problems should be dealt with first, so that the masses can survive in a burgeoning economy.
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries 73
- The column graph shows the rate of consumers in three age groups taking healthy food between 2011 and 2016 72
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 73
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 606, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... systems is the need of the hour. Hence, higher authorities should channelize the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4303030303 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95773099444 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627272727273 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0682905212 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.411764706 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4117647059 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0833158997949 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0247989578065 0.084324248473 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.023993237841 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0471965153514 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202635884996 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.