Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give your

Essay topics:

Some people believe that international trade and communication with other countries is a positive trend, while others think it is harmful to nations and they might lose their identities. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples.

One of the most important factorials nowadays for a nation to develop is international trade and communication. With that advancement, some people think the trend is beneficial, while others think it is bad for nations. From my perspective, interaction between a variety of regions is essential for creating favorable conditions that will assist the nation's development. In this paraghragh below, I will partly dicuss and explain the reason for my points of view.
On the one hand, doing international trade may hurt the fame of some national brands. For instance, most of Vietnamese people perfer to drink Cocacole. That mean many of the country's brands have poor financial standing, which could cause the nation to decrease gradually. Additionally, employees of some well-known industrial enterprises will be replaced by excellent foreigners. It explains that many people may not have jobs in their own countries.
Opposite the negative side of global trade, opening up the market to foreign investment will benefit the home country profusely. That means the economy of poor countries will increase and become the devolop countries. Futhermore, international trade will enhance people's knowledge in poor nations. That is because there will be an increase the skill and learning when large countries work with and invest in developing countries. Finally, the most crucial things of global communication is to stop failure of economy, civilization and the development of poor countries.
In conclusion, through the reason above, I strongly believe that the international trade and communication will be benefit.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-13 harmankaur1203 56 view
2022-10-23 Koi 89 view
2022-10-23 cleee 89 view
2022-10-23 Huyle121212 61 view
2022-10-23 Huyle121212 61 view
Essays by user Huyle121212 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 351, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...vorable conditions that will assist the nations development. In this paraghragh below, ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, may, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52822580645 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06512886489 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592741935484 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8796212904 49.4020404114 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.4 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5333333333 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217372876374 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740183506077 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689226776712 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128526780606 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329793661893 0.056905535591 58% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.