Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion
Over the last century, the world has been facing a tremendous increase in the number of information in all fields such as science and business. People have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In this essay, I will negotiate both views and state my own opinion.
On the one hand, several people claim that a plethora of information ought to be open freely to society. The strongest argument that it provides us with up-to-date information regarding medical achievements and technologies that could facilitate our day-to-day lives. For example, researchers may reach faster outstanding results by collaborating with others and sharing knowledge namely the evolution of new cancer drugs or stem cells. In the same way, the accessibility to new technologies like the internet has broadened people’s cognition about other cultures, cuisines and geographic features of lands. It means that the vast majority of people may learn new things at home by surfing on the internet without spending money on books or tutors.
On the other hand, several people suppose that some information should not be available for everyone if it might endanger for folks. First of all, information regarding the technologies of weapons or nuclear science, which could be used against inhabitants. For example, if this data had uncovered for terrorists, it might lead to wars or terrorist attacks against inhabitants. Moreover, information concerning companies’ secrets namely algorithms and protocols have to be kept confidential trying to maintain a competitive edge over other companies or to safeguard new discoveries.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, I believe that some information is overmuch sensitive and confidential and cannot be revealed to everyone on purpose to avoid dangerous situations globally.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | Sheetal Bataniya | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-23 | lipsa pipaliya | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-07 | tamimadnan6240 | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | kuldeep sharma | 93 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodations in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ness. People have different views about whether or not this data should be shared freely. In t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, for example, in conclusion, such as, first of all, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52631578947 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08305868358 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610526315789 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.987514335 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.153846154 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.69230769231 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233900735531 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775860799934 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499159117965 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138424413768 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190853796843 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.