Information remains one of the major forms of communication which normally plays pivotal roles in the present century. While some people insist that supplying more information is truly excellent in experimental investigations, professions and the learning fields, others claim that some data seem extremely worthwhile or precious to be exchanged among folks openly. This essay will discuss both sides and reach a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, transmitting materials to one another especially in the analysis territory can provoke bitter conflicts between two peers. For illustration, if one...
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help local community.The believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole. Do you agree or disagree? 90
- TOPIC In many countries woman no longer feel the need to get married Some people believe that this is because woman are able to earn their own income and therefore do not require the financial security that marriage can bring To what extent do you agree 65
- Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 89
- Sports today is turning into a business; with many companies involved and ever growing prize money for the sportsmen. Do you think it is positive or negative development? 90
- Topic: Some people believe that mature employees are beneficial to a company. Others think that younger employees contribute more and hence are more beneficial to a company. Discuss both views with your own perception. 70
Essay evaluation report
each other's error
each other's errors
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 8.0 out of 9
Category: Excellent Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 15 15
No. of Words: 337 350
No. of Characters: 1936 1500
No. of Different Words: 238 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.285 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.745 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.191 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 132 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 95 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 75 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.467 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.494 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.6 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.275 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.49 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.03 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...es. Not only would experts rectify each others error but also the collaborative effort...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1983.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 337.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88427299703 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28438527646 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697329376855 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.6699999214 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.2 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4666666667 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.13333333333 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14648786702 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363601836401 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042675038751 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738186383756 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621078810851 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.12 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.