It is generally believed that people own many alternatives in today’s world. I personally agree with this opinion, which I will explain below.
First and foremost, it appears that there are some proofs for where having many options would offer some advantages in people's life. Perhaps, the first one is when people, especially students, who would finish their study from secondary school have some options either to continue their study to university or to work in the available job. In addition, recently, many kinds of transportation that may become the alternatives when people want to go to same places could help people for traveling in the city and even in the world. These range from motorcycle to plane for far traveling. Furthermore, the last probable proof is related to the meals for many people. To illustrate, many types of cuisine in the world such as traditional food, international food, fast food, and many others could help people to eat a suitable taste for each person.
Looking from another perspective, it might be said that having too many alternatives would make a confusing and would take much time for people to decide on an important thing immediately. For instance, people would spare much time when they have to face the situation to choose which one the activity that they have to commit firstly. However, in my opinion, it would not be a big problem, if the person could manage their time and make a list of advantage and disadvantage of each option.
In summary, it is logical to conclude that many alternatives can be helpful for people to obtain the suitable thing that they need. Not only can having too many choices to help people to choose their future life after finishing their school, but they can choose a comfortable transportation for traveling and a suitable food for their tastes as well.
- The two maps below shows road access to a hospital in 2007 and in 2009 61
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. 52
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 56
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, may, second, so, well, for instance, in addition, in summary, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93890675241 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67241843416 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533762057878 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.7102681003 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.153846154 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251016094101 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985090053794 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731454084363 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15514829885 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297959475984 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.