Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Thanks to the upsurge of technology and industrialization that people nowadays are mostly equipped with basic living needs. As a result, some people contend that we are having more options than we actually need. However, I just partly agree with this statement since there are some remote areas do not have the opportunities to receive many choices.
On the one hand, people nowadays have a surplus of opportunities. Firstly, we have a variety of food daily, from traditional dishes to international ones, vegetarian food to seafood menus, local fruits and vegetables to imported products and the like. Consequently, citizens are not afraid of the lack of food; however, they are suffering from the overwhelming of what to eat every day. Secondly, the choices of information resources also considered as too much. For example, when looking for a destination for a summer holiday, people are provided with hundreds of suggestions as well as means of transportation and activities should be included in the journey. Additionally, there are also numerous tips and benefits or risks when taking the trip. Therefore, travelers have to spend a great amount of time on digesting the information.
On the other hand, the distribution of opportunities to access these choices is not properly fair since there are still people who are lack of opportunities in rural and undeveloped areas. In fact, citizens in North Korea still do not have choices to catch up with the latest news worldwide. They are not allowed to use the Internet as a device to provide information freely. In addition to that, poor governments in Africa are unable to provide their citizens with a wide range of food, or even fresh and healthy meal. As a result, those people have lived with the lack of choices instead of thousands of opinions like the others in other places.
In conclusion, the abundance of choices is a current phenomenon around the world except for fo several special cases. Governments in industrialized and modern countries should join hand to assist in the development of the unfortunate ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-12 | ochirvaani | 84 | view |
- In the modern world it is possible to shop, work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face-to-face contact with others. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of people living alone in 5 different age group in the USA between 1850 and 2000. 67
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The chart shows the global water use by sector and water consumption in Brazil and Congo in 2000. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'peopled'.
Suggestion: peopled
...not properly fair since there are still people who are lack of opportunities in rural ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...perly fair since there are still people who are lack of opportunities in rural and unde...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, look, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, as to, except for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97077174561 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2786161745 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.823529412 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1176470588 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1176470588 7.06120827912 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221995456215 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642892759627 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724985170294 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128341701287 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118196401091 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.