Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighborhood or teaching sports to younger children) To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is no doubt that children should be motivated to perform free social work for the progress of their nation. While few individuals opine that, it should be made obligatory for secondary school learners, whereas in my opinion I do not completely agree with this view and will support my explanation with relevant examples.
On the one hand, adolescents should be encouraged to provide unpaid welfare services for the betterment of their society. The reason is that it will inculcate a sense of responsibility and affection, which in turn would aid these youngsters to lead a successful life. For example, a study done by the UK news channel in 2011, reported a professional success achieved among those teenagers who were involved in catering for needs of senior citizens in their schools. As a result, they could handle the requirements of old people in the workplace in an efficient manner. However, school pupil should not feel compelled to perform this good act, otherwise, they may avoid it. Also, spending too much time for these community activities may have a detrimental effect on their academic performance.
On the other hand, I believe students should be given autonomy to choose whether they agree to do service or not. This is because, teenagers may feel burdened, which lead to a lack of enthusiasm and resentment. For instance, in my own experience, during my secondary school, I was forced to do social service of teaching poor children. Therefore, I skipped delivering those lessons by making various excuses. In contrast, children should feel the urge to do good community work from their own heart. Besides that, the effectiveness of community participation has many more determinates apart from willingness. These include the activity design, target population, and intended outcomes.
In conclusion, while it is beneficial for students to do free social service, in my opinion, it should not be made obligatory, but left to one’s own choice.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-04-05 | Bhimani Nikunj | 11 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emission which result from this energy use. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 56
- The government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children, rather than on professional sports and art performance for the general public.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 73
- Some people believe that children should do organized activities in their free time while others believe that children should be free to do what they want to do in their free time. Which viewpoint do you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to s 84
- Government should spend money to encourage sports and arts in school children, rather than on professional sports and art performance for general public.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 545, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient manner" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...irements of old people in the workplace in an efficient manner. However, school pupil should not feel ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, whereas, while, apart from, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18125 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92200033154 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603125 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0720944394 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.625 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3125 7.06120827912 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266989334819 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810838621576 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658882325896 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16429250367 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368064264377 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.