Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement
To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
A growing number of people insist that the wastes from houses are not reused in desirable amounts. It is their claim that reprocessing rubbish needs to be made legal by governments so as to increase the rate of recyclings. I am totally in favour of this idea and this essay will put forward the reasons of reconditioning of insufficient litters from residences and the significance of imposing a law for remodelling debris.
On the one hand, inadequate spaces and suffering great inconveniences can be one of the rationalities for household-members. This can be exemplified by the fact that many people are usually found to share a small apartment and lack enough spaces to place their goods. So, family members and merchandises are taken priority over discarded matters. Also, the majority of people have to travel a long distance to dispose the rubbish, which they often find time consuming and an uneasy task. Therefore, in order to bring a change, the government needs to impose a strict law.
On the other hand, enforcing laws may act as an effective deterrent. To illustrate, knowing that people will be punished by heavy fines and long term imprisonments, they are compelled to follow the rules and regulations which means that a significant proportion of them tend to control the load of consumptions and eventually maintain a balance in the dispositions. Not only could it prevent domestic members from creating excessive wastes but also companies and factories would be obliged as well, who typically constitute a major percentage in the creation of litters. On top of that, vulnerable atmospheres and ecosystems can be protected by passing laws. For an instance, burning waste materials releases huge amounts of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide and methane, which collectively give rise to global warming that is proved to be utterly disastrous to human beings, wild animals and ecological communities.
To conclude, although recycling is not carried out by family members in sufficient numbers, enacting a law can tackle the problem effectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-03-14 | mabick_1527 | 55 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart shows the scores of teams A B and C over four different seasons Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 word 77
- Without capital punishment (the death penalty) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree?What other measures do you think might be effective? 76
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the cours 30
Comments
Dear sir, I would request you
Dear sir, I would request you to comment on task response and lexical resources also for this essay so that I can improve on it. Thank you sir.
Essay evaluation report
flaws:
The essay is not exactly right on the point. The essay is about 'not enough of the waste from homes is recycled'. for example, papers, plastics ...should be picked up from wastes, and they can be reused. Some reasons like:
1. people don't have the sense of recycling
2. people don't like the extra job to separate items from wastes for recycling.
3. the law is not available for the punishment or the fine is too small.
4. and more...
---------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: ? out of 9
Category: ? Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 334 350
No. of Characters: 1698 1500
No. of Different Words: 210 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.275 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.084 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.005 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 126 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 98 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.857 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.426 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.571 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.292 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.514 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.025 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...h needs to be made legal by governments so as to increase the rate of recyclings. I am t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imposing a law for remodelling debris. On the one hand, inadequate spaces and s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20958083832 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08071466148 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62874251497 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.6180751104 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20121931948 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0617050869365 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045163701541 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115329407397 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0482991279971 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.12 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.