Most people would like to work with reputable companies which have positively effect on the employee’s resume. However, some people think that working in a smaller company is more valuable than a big one. Personally, I prefer to work for a big organization for a number of reasons.
Firstly, working with a large company provides more opportunities in term of career advancement. Most large companies compromised of a variety of departments and each department has own functions and projects to achieve a goal. If a person wants to extend their abilities to be more specialized or develop some skills, they also move to work in other sections or choose to focus on some tasks. This opportunity can be acquired only in a large company because in a smaller one a person cannot move further like this.
Secondly, solving complicated issues is a skill that a person can improve while working in a big company. Advanced systems and a large number of co-workers make it very challenging for a worker to deal with this situation. Many conflicts or system’s problems will improve a person potential work. Some advanced skills such as solving problem, making decision and effective communication can be developed when individuals work in a big workplace. However, if one gets used to it, he/she will find it as an exciting experience to deal with them.
Thirdly, working for a large organization can help a person build up their confidence. Dealing with a large number of people or responsibilities in high position makes a person to be more confident when he/she has more tasks to do. Without being confident, it can lead to less supportive beliefs from others which affect a person’s outlook.
In conclusion, there are many advantages of working with a big company which cannot be found in a small organization such as dealing with various people, tremendous changes and building up a person’s confidence. All of these support that why I prefer to work with a big organization.
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The graph below shows the pollution levels in London between 1600 and 2000. 56
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 56
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'effected'.
Suggestion: effected
...putable companies which have positively effect on the employee's resume. However,...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 128, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... in a big company. Advanced systems and a large number of co-workers make it very challenging for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...build up their confidence. Dealing with a large number of people or responsibilities in high posi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05135951662 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06475775835 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528700906344 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8261855482 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4705882353 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25882238123 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940533526514 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.070255439459 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156900159883 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0666940923224 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.