There is an ongoing debate whether the most effective way to spending government fundings on indangered languags or not. Advocates claim spending on saving historic languages is worth whilst others do not. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and opine which one is superior.
The cheif argument tto use public funds on languages which are under threat, it helps to preserve rich culture. The thought process of any individual is either directly or indirectly linked to the language they speak. There are number of languages which hardly used to communicate,has wealthy history and traditional background. For an increase Sanskrit, which greately used all over India in the past. All Hinduism is based on this but in present time, it is under threat. All the holy books related to culture, rituals, medicine, history was initially written in Sanskrit. Hence, to preserve this prosperous religion and it's thoughts it is necessary to invest in projects which helps to increase popularity amongst people.
However, wide range of other sectors like healthcare, education, infrastructure and so on, which are more essential. The many developing nations are suffering from hunger, unemployment, diseases, poverty and many more issues. This money should spend to generate employment and construct educational establishments because it comes under basic human rights. The research carried out by renowned publication shows that more than fifty percent of undeveloped County's residents are struggling for basic needs everyday. That is the reason why government should use it to improve life of the citizens.
In conclusion, the basic needs are more vital in my prospective. The authority should overcome problems like unemployment and poverty. When situations are under control then they could think about spending on threating languages.
- Some companies and organizations require their employees to wear uniform What are the advantages and disadvantages of wearing uniform 61
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports for younger children To what extend do you agree or disagree
- Many people prefer to stay in the same type of work all their life whereas others prefer tochange the type of work Discuss both sides and state your own opinion 78
- Some people consider online education better than classroom studies While others think classroom study is better Discuss both views and give your opinion and examples 89
- Some people believe that no one should be allowed to continue working after age 65 However others say there should not be a limitation on age and anyone should be allowed to work regardless of their age Discuss both views and give your opinion and include 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 281, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , has
...nguages which hardly used to communicate,has wealthy history and traditional backgr...
^^^^
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges which hardly used to communicate,has wealthy history and traditional backgrou...
^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...esidents are struggling for basic needs everyday. That is the reason why government shou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “When” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...problems like unemployment and poverty. When situations are under control then they ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49825783972 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83520514753 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648083623693 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.9270105593 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.6666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 7.06120827912 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14593630935 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043699033041 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427371435071 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0872352889475 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476620498048 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.32 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.