There have always controversy as regards whether or not the advancement economy in some countries should make environment contamination. While some people are agree with opinion, I hold firm strongly opinion that it is capable of both the growth of economy and fresh environment.
It is undeniable that a majority of countries allocate fund for the economic growth lead to the failing remember about protecting environment commissions. To make way for the massive erection of industrial buildings, roads, flyovers, deforestation will happen at a high speed. Thus, it is highly likely that the world might encounter a large amount of natural disasters such as the drought or flood in some highlands, lowlands respectively. Secondly, the development of economy the mostly depend on industrialization can entail the increase in exhaust emissions discharged from manufacturing factories .as a results, the more carbon footprint emissions, the more global life will eradicate. For instance, China well-known the second largest economy in the world, It was also the most polluted nation in 2016.
On the other hand, I advocated with the view that our boosting economic development and also reserving our green environment. Each nation should build up the knowledge and enhance the skills how to use correctly some resources and protect a dense forest in order to the limit of climate changes. For instance, only using environmental friendly energy sources such as wind and solar power serve the need of energy. In addition, we should invent in the upgradation of waste treatment system to eradicate environmental problem. Nevertheless, if we classify and recycle them, it is not only definitely the ideal way to decrease nylon or plastics but also gain a benefit of the saving money for our governments.
In conclusion, although environmental degradation is an unavoidable in some countries that became a wealth countries, I hold firm the belief that it is quite possible if we take actions to increase the use of alternative energy and encourage recycling.
- The graph below shows information on employment rates across 6 countries in 1995 and 2005.Summarise the information by choosing and describe the main idea, and make comparisons where appropriate. 61
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think that this is a positive or negative development? 67
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.Cambridge 6 test 1 task 1 73
- The graph below shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000. 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...here have always controversy as regards whether or not the advancement economy in some countri...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...t contamination. While some people are agree with opinion, I hold firm strongly opin...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 601, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... discharged from manufacturing factories .as a results, the more carbon footprint ...
^^
Line 2, column 606, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...harged from manufacturing factories .as a results, the more carbon footprint emissions, t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 461, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, we should invent in the upgradation of waste treatment system to eradicate e...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...native energy and encourage recycling.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as regards, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3950617284 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09351037366 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1757907624 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.461538462 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9230769231 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5384615385 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229531226777 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710907724275 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061034625262 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115375258257 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077295319867 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.