People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology has facilitated easier shopping. While there are several benefits to e-commerce, including convenience and the greater availability of information about a product, I still believe that it bears some inconveniences, such as the absence of opportunities to try purchased goods and inadequate refund polities.
There are several benefits to e-commerce, including convenience and the greater availability of information about a product, I still believe that it bears some inconveniences, such as the absence of opportunities to try purchased goods and inadequate policies.
On the one hand, online shopping is superior to conventional shopping in the following aspects. For one, due to the unlimited operating hours of the internet, users are able to make purchase orders whenever they want. Those shopping traditionally, however, have to do it at a fixed time. Additionally, e-commerce customers have more chances to get a deep insight into commodities in terms of their quality, prices and comments from other customers through the internet. For example, online shoppers can make a decision quickly and accurately by reading customers’ evaluations when making a purchase on the internet.
On the other hand, technological advancements have made shopping more complicated in the following ways. Chief of these is that, for certain products purchased via the internet such as clothing, opportunities to try them are impossible. In case of unfit garments or minor scratches for instance, e-commerce shoppers are more likely to make wrong purchases as they lack the ability to physically check them. Furthermore, there are few comprehensible refund or exchange terms available on online retailers, leading to a lack of understanding or even misunderstanding. If there are such refund policies, they are usually complex and intricate. For example, those shopping on Shopee or Lazada must fill out a set of forms and make a video recording of the commodities they have bought in case of exchanging products or refunding money, while customers who shop traditionally can get their money back or exchange their products more easily by just presenting the product and receipt.
In conclusion, I believe that virtual shopping has many benefits, such as greater convenience and more available information regarding products. However, it also has several drawbacks, including the lack of opportunities to try these products and vague refund regulations. I am also convinced that internet-based shopping will be more popular if they change their policies about before and after sales-services
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 84
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving cars or riding motorbikes To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor bike To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
People’s opinions differ as to whether or not advanced technology has facilitated eas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2250.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 404.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56930693069 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2746392817 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.7764647215 49.4020404114 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.352941176 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7647058824 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103019881161 0.244688304435 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408087834542 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557800842494 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637795892008 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411804811172 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.