Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree

Some people opine that music is a good choice for uniting people who come from different culture and age background. I completely agree with the statement that music can be advantageous in joining people together.

Firstly, this is because music serves as a common interest between people. It does not matter where people come from or how old they are, music can always be a topic that unite all of them. This is because music can be enjoyed by different kind of people. For instance, many people become fans of Queen band, ranging from young to old people. As a result, when these people meet, they can talk about Queen band and their songs, despite of their age and cultural differences. A lot of them also become acquainted and befriended because of this common interest.

Secondly, it is because music can be used as a communication bridge. The writers usually put a feeling in the lyrics and words that are contained in the music, and use music to pass a message to someone. The listeners of the music, who can be anyone from any background, then will also do the same, where they will pass the music to those they want to send a message about. Consequently, many people then will be indirectly united through the words and lyrics from the song. For example, a band named LANY wrote song which is titled ILYSB, to express their feelings to their loved ones, which are reflected in their lyrics. As a result, many of their listeners, use that song to convey their feeling to the people whom they love.

In conclusion, I completely agree that music can be beneficial in uniting people together because music serves as a common interest between people and music can be used as a communication bridge.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70666666667 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46486420631 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3275224711 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257791205389 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101121867433 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951226965565 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216553652713 0.151304729494 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112862120081 0.056905535591 198% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.