Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress, because what matters is the quality of their work. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, many people believe that the most important thing with employers is productive working performance of their employees who can wear whatever they want to when they go to workplaces. From my view, I partly agree with the opinion.
On one hand, if managers of companies do not ask their workers to wear any specific clothes when they are working, there are some benefits from this trend. The first merit of the issue is that people can choose any outfits which help them feel comfortable while they are working. Indeed, they have to wear the clothes for 8 hours on a daily basis, if their clothes are not suitable for them, how they can concentrate on their work. Thus, suitable outfit will make them work efficiently. The second advantage of the matter is that people tend not to spend much money on expensive clothes, which help them save money for themselves. In other words, people can use their budgets for other pivotal purposes such as supporting their own families, caring their parents and doing charity works. For example, a lot of man in Ho Chi Minh city tend to use their money for paying cost of living than buying new clothes.
On the other hand, appearances of people also play pivotal roles in their careers. Indeed, people who have to meet customers everyday need to dress smartly because this is the first impression they have with their potential customers. As a result, customers tend to listen to them thanks to their nice appearance. Thus, they have opportunities to increase the revenue of their company. For instance, the employees who sale clothes in stores tend to convince their customers successful due to the fact that they have nice outfits, which are the products of the stores. The other point which needs to be mentioned is that if employees of the companies have gorgeous clothes, they will make the companies are the good places not only for their customers but also for their coworkers to go to. Indeed, above of all, who can deny beautiful things when this feature is the nature of the mankind.
In conclusion, although the quality of employees’ works is the most important for organizations, their outfits also contribute to the success of the companies. Therefore, I partly agree with the statement that employers should not care about the clothes of their workers due to the benefits of their nice outfits as aforementioned analysis.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-26 | haimeo1201 | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | binh01012000 | 11 | view |
| 2018-12-28 | sam2019 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-07 | RAL2 | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-03 | Elmi | 73 | view |
- Some people think government should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Instead of trying to prevent climate change, people should find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The diagram shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 74
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems, as well as practical problemsTo what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Topic: Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9039408867 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55967270113 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487684729064 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8115866128 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.611111111 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61111111111 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255735221915 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892685655651 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057574112166 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178142558939 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503911202987 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.