Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
People have different views about whether governments should offer financial aid to creative artists. Some people agree with the idea of the governmental investment in artists, while there is an argument that these artists should gain economic benefit from other organizations. In this essay I will examine both sides of the debate to seek a conclusion.
To begin with, it is undeniable that government funding artists can help well preserve its culture. This is because artworks are always tightly bound to a nation’s history, belief, culture and ethos. Subsidizing these artists and encouraging them to create freely without considering money will therefore have important implications to a country’s cultural diversity. For example, it is the Chinese authorities that have invested enormous amounts of money in the people with artistic talent, not only reviving the national culture, but also making it more colorful.
On the other hand, nevertheless, the reason why other groups instead of the government should take the responsibility of funding artists is that the state has more important concerns, such as education, healthcare, infrastructure and security. If the government pumps money into the art domain, then there is not enough money available for these basic needs.
In conclusion, governmental help is sometimes necessary to artists. However, if these artists are supported exclusively by the government, then the nation will undertake larger economic stress and there is a possibility that the creations of artists will be influenced and even controlled by the preference of the authorities. Therefore, from my perspective, artists should not only count on the government but also on other sources like entrepreneurs.
- The chart below shows the different levels of post-school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 78
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable and there are more beneficial ways to spend money To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: University students should be required to take basic science classes even if they are not part of the field of the study. 81
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 360, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... money available for these basic needs. In conclusion, governmental help is some...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58646616541 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09369031751 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.0844133602 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.833333333 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262706050197 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896392220471 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073148402466 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160524060709 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550178780336 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.