Some people think that having people from different nationalities and cultural backgrounds living together in the same country makes the country develop faster Do you agree

Cultural diversity would help the country develop faster, or would curb the developmental graph of the nation. This topic was always contentious among the masses from decades. I, however, believe that having people from different nationalities and cultural background would aid in faster development of a country. The below paragraphs will elaborate my opinion with relevant examples.

Multicultural countries in the contemporary world have exemplified, the importance of ethnic diversity. Furthermore, Some countries contribute their development to the vast number of immigrants. There are myriad advantages that cultural and national diversity bring to the table. Firstly, most developed countries require man power, they promote immigration as they lack the man power to sustain their graying community. For instance, Canada is estimated to have a aging population, thereby, to curb this age graph they have always respected the thought of cultural diversity.

Secondly, increasing population due to multipal nationality, expansion in economy is seemingly possible. subsequently, establishment of industries, factories is pivotal to sustain the increase in population. Consequently, this will aid in boosting the national economy. For instance, America is the country of immigrants. Thanks great minds from different ethnic background, they have become the most strongest nation in the globe. Exemplifying, the potential of multicultural country in the modern world. Not only did they over come the racism within their community, but also they have realized how imperative it is to value each and every individual withing their country. By doing so they have acquired the best minds this world has to offer, further reinforcing their countries might.

In conclusion, I think history has exemplified how important ethnic diversity is, there are without a doubt many draw back with this approach, however, in my belief pros outweigh the cons in many aspects.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...r instance, Canada is estimated to have a aging population, thereby, to curb this...
^
Line 5, column 106, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Subsequently
...nsion in economy is seemingly possible. subsequently, establishment of industries, factories...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'strongest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: strongest
...ethnic background, they have become the most strongest nation in the globe. Exemplifying, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'most the strongest'.
Suggestion: most the strongest
...ethnic background, they have become the most strongest nation in the globe. Exemplifying, the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, i think, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1682.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74061433447 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04451781878 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607508532423 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4965618132 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.4444444444 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296127336092 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910318607127 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892021254772 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166765370374 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100254994136 0.056905535591 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.