Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

There is a relentless controversy about whether money expensed on wildlife protection should be used for helping people instead. I totally disagree with this view, while the expenditure on human use cannot be ignored, protecting wild animals play an essential role in maintaining biodiversity.

To begin, there are several compelling reasons why countries need to invest more money in preserving their native animal species. First, human activity is no doubt the main cause of most problems wild animals face. To be more specific, with the ever-increase in urbanization and globalization rate, more and more forests are demolished to make room for agricultural and industrial zones, which leads to destroying the natural habitats of these animals. Moreover, nowadays, rare and specious animals still are hunted for human purposes such as “trophies” or treatment, which puts these animals on the brink of extinction. Consequently, we should be responsible for preserving these animals and their natural habitats so that they can live as wild and free as they used to.

Secondly, while many people assume that humans are the superior race on our planet, others, including myself, feel that all living beings, human and animal, have equal rights to live in peace. Furthermore, animals play a significant role in maintaining biodiversity and have profound impacts on human well-being. In other words, different species are mutually reliant on the food chain, therefore, the vanishing of a particular species from the chain can result in the widespread disruption of the whole ecosystem.

In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that the protection of wild animals proves of essential significance and should be considered as a global priority.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-01-02 vyhanh 78 view
Essays by user vyhanh :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45756457565 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98934897522 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612546125461 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7631741114 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.454545455 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6363636364 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5454545455 7.06120827912 192% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201213627426 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076407211515 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519507823883 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125857272132 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678874730018 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.