Teaching children about positive social values and skills to play useful roles in society involves multiple elements, with no restrictions on sole responsibility of school or parents.
Parents, of course, are the primary life coaches for children since birth. They not only provide the first and direct education on how to behave in the home, but also act as role models to their offspring. In other words, children automatically imitate their parents’ social practice at the beginning: what verbal and body languages parents use; how they interact with neighbours and friends; how much time they spend on social activities like volunteering in the communities; what kind of actions they take when conflicts occur among families. If parents pass the right values over to their next generation and demonstrate the right social practice themselves, children are very likely to grow into decent human beings who can make great contributions to society.
However, school plays another vital role in educating social values and cultivating children to become great society members, which cannot be underestimated. First, teachers are the secondary and equally crucial mentors to emphasize common knowledge of rules and laws in a bigger social group than at home. They guide students through daily school activities, including in the class, in a playground, and among the students’ team projects. Moreover, peers, children’s little friends with multicultural backgrounds, share their own social values, and discuss their confusion during the growing process. Peer support can be undeniably powerful to favour children’s social skills development and value formation.
In sum, parents or school alone cannot excel the best educational roles in children’s social development. Instead, when they work together as a dynamic team, and with every member of society who shoulder their responsibilities to help our children to learn, clarify their misconception, and timely support their growth, children will have the best chances to turn into the positive images of social world.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 89
- The diagram below shows City Park before and after a swimming pool was constructed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 69
- Some people think that our behaviour customs and traditions are no longer relevant and have to change due to the influence of modern ways of life Do you agree or disagree Include any relevant examples in your response 95
- World history suggests that violence and conflict were more evident under male leadership than under female leadership So for peace to prevail female leadership can be considered as a better option than male leadership 89
- The graphs below indicate the effect of treatment in two types of cancer in females Using the information in the graphs describe and compare the situation with and without treatment for the two types of cancer 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 671, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
...ly powerful to favour children’s social skills development and value formation. In ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the positive images of social world.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, kind of, of course, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58917197452 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88079286026 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627388535032 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3224897286 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.25 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.25 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1521672984 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0588019191541 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0315130907052 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100571736615 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00693239858656 0.056905535591 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.