Nowadays, it is too difficult for people to find appropriate jobs. Someone holds the belief that people should choose steady jobs to have job satisfaction than switching it regularly. In my point of view, both keeping and switching a job provide people with the benefits of a lot.
On the one hand, having a suitable job early and continuing doing it will bring about some merits as follows. Firstly, it helps people become masters in their fields. In fact, the sooner they have the career, the better their skill will be successful. As a result, they will easily complete their work and be more effective than others who switch their jobs rapidly. Secondly, they would earn much money and have a satisfying life if they have a steady job. Take some billionaires in the world for example, they started up their business very soon and took their luxurious retirement package, too.
On the other hand, there are several merits to job hopping. First of all, the new working environment helps them to change their mind about happiness. Lots of people are under pressure at their old workplaces because of the lack of interest, then becoming happiness with a new one. However, can find more good ideas in other aspects, their lives also have a cluster of changed days after all. Moreover, people have the chance to try their hands at different fields and thus acquire more skills. In fact, when they do a wide range of jobs, their knowledge will be comprehensive. Therefore, they will always have a suitable solution to tackle any problems happening in their lives.
In conclusion, I partly agree with the idea that people who choose a stable occupation early will have better lives than those who change it frequently. It is suggested that people should consider changing their job if they can not find any eagerness to do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to steady'
Suggestion: to steady
...ds the belief that people should choose steady jobs to have job satisfaction than swit...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, after all, for example, in conclusion, in fact, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82165605096 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45530454868 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570063694268 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1415744422 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1111111111 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4444444444 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251682238115 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0862974282452 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667521283263 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192885872392 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.087946435945 0.056905535591 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.38 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.