It is argued that physical schools are no longer essential due to the availability of e-learning courses on the internet. While the internet allows its users to study at home in a more convenient and cost-effective environment, I believe that traditional schools play an important role in the fully comprehensive development of children.
Undoubtedly, online learning courses are superior to physical schools in terms of their 24/7 services. Due to the unlimited operating hours of the internet, users can access online lessons whenever they want. Those attending traditional classes, on the other hand, have to attend lessons at a fixed time. Additionally, online learning courses also offer their lessons for free or at a low charge, while conventional students have to pay a sum for tuition fees, books, or even facility charges on a monthly basis. By learning through the internet, e-learners are able to save money and allocate it to other critical areas, making their lives more comfortable.
However, studying on the internet may not allow students to make comprehensive progress. Moreover, online learners may find it challenging to comprehend lesson content without direct guidance from teachers, while students in physical schools can benefit from their teachers' explanations in class. Apart from that, students attending traditional schools have more chances to interact face-to-face with each other, express their feelings and even socialize through classroom group activities or extracurricular activities after school. This helps them to develop useful and practical skills, such as communication and teamwork skills, which are not adequately developed through online learning. Moreover, children receiving formal education are taught invaluable moral lessons such as politeness, honesty, and respect for older people. Without education, children may not acquire both wisdom and morality.
In conclusion, although e-learning can provide its learners with more convenience and cost-effectiveness, traditional schools make a significant contribution to the well-rounded development of children. Despite the increasing popularity of e-learning, I believe that physical schools will continue to play a crucial role in modern societies.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of young people in higher education in 2000 2005 and 2010 67
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each categories from five organizations 73
- The diagram below shows the production of ethanol oil from grain Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 73
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprehending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: comprehending
...online learners may find it challenging to comprehend lesson content without direct guidance ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, apart from, even so, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1923.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82727272727 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13793841302 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584848484848 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4611395996 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.2 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0574197458601 0.244688304435 23% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224266341672 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233777359432 0.0667982634062 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0459114066633 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263079648855 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.53 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.