Nowadays, public transport is considered one of the most convenient means of transport for people to use. Therefore, some people think that public transport should be funded by the government so that it can be free to people who use it. In my opinion, I strongly disagree with this point of view.
There is a main reason why people want to be paid for using public transport. If the public transport were funded by the government, it would be very economical for dwellers. Everybody would have chances to use public transportation, even the poor. Inhabitants would tend to use public transport rather than using cars or motorbikes. As a result, the number of private vehicles would be decreased, so it has a good impact on the environment.
On the other hand, using public transport for free has some serious demerits. Firstly, people will be lack of responsibility for the roles in public transport. They will throw the rubbish in the bus, in the train,...Therefore, the carriages would become dirty, crowded and uncomfortable. Secondly, public transport contains a large number of people, if the government pays for all expenditures, it would be a good chance for thieves doing bad things. The security in public transport cannot be ensured.
In conclusion, using public transportation for free has some benefits, but this kind of measure will have drawbacks, it declines the quality of security in the public transport and the services cannot be developed. Personally, I do not agree with the idea “using free public transport” because all the reasons I told above.
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Students leave high school without learning the way how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions of this issue 59
- 2 With the increasing demand for energy sources of oil and gas people should look for sources of oil and gas in remote and untouched natural places Do the advantages outweigh disadvantages of damaging such areas Surroundings 73
- Many animal species are becoming extinct due to human activities on land and in the sea What are the reasons and solutions to solve this issue 84
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...row the rubbish in the bus, in the train,...Therefore, the carriages would become ...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...the rubbish in the bus, in the train,...Therefore, the carriages would become dirty, crow...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...le. Secondly, public transport contains a large number of people, if the government pays for all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in public transport cannot be ensured. In conclusion, using public transportati...
^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...measure will have drawbacks, it declines the quality of security in the public tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06923076923 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.029099501 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.995067454 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479788385821 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188286212607 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143009969117 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348046667037 0.151304729494 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140017613192 0.056905535591 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...row the rubbish in the bus, in the train,...Therefore, the carriages would become ...
^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Therefore
...the rubbish in the bus, in the train,...Therefore, the carriages would become dirty, crow...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 325, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...le. Secondly, public transport contains a large number of people, if the government pays for all ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 504, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in public transport cannot be ensured. In conclusion, using public transportati...
^^^
Line 4, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...measure will have drawbacks, it declines the quality of security in the public tr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, kind of, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1318.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06923076923 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.029099501 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530769230769 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.995067454 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.86666666667 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.479788385821 0.244688304435 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188286212607 0.084324248473 223% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143009969117 0.0667982634062 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348046667037 0.151304729494 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140017613192 0.056905535591 246% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.