A group of people argue that students who have good academic performance should be honoured by the schools, while others have a different view and opine that scholars who have improved their studies deserve more significance. Although improvement in the study sometimes does not come with positive results, I believe that children with sharp and smart minds have to give more priority.
First and foremost, those children who worked hard to bring improvement in their studies, sometimes come with very excellent results, then compared to toppers of their class and get appreciate from their teachers and parents. But it will not benefit the school as much as those students with sharp minds. For example, if one student has very poor grades every semester, and one day with his hard work, he is able to achieve only passing marks, it will be good for him, but there will be no benefits to other students or schools because getting only pass marks will not be effective to achieve any good position, and none of the students will remember them after their graduation.
On the other hand, children with good knowledge and sharp minds will remain a motivation for other students. They have a unique way of studying, and to secure their position, they will never disbalance their study. For example, if one scholar from one school always had very good academic performance, he or she would always secure the top position in their classes. In this case, the school will be proud to send these students to participate in every competition, and along with these other graduates, they will also be influenced by those students; they will get motivated by seeing their actions, so it will be a source of pride for the academy.
In conclusion, the benefit of encouraging smart children is that they will be motivated by others, however, students with improvement will not remember after their graduation. I believe that having the best academic background will be the pride of schools
- The chart shows coffee production in four countries from 1990 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 56
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 56
- Nowadays plastic money replacements such as credit and debit cards are extremely popular even more than banknotes and coins Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of this 61
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9578313253 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.533388595 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496987951807 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.7901329195 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1818181818 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15292894263 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766322719828 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612284947074 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121391303107 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630103357463 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9578313253 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.533388595 2.80592935109 90% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496987951807 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 0.809619238477 741% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.7901329195 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.636363636 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1818181818 20.7667163134 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.45454545455 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15292894263 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766322719828 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612284947074 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121391303107 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630103357463 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.