The modern life brings much noise which is one of the issues which affects of quality of people’s life. Some people are of the opinion that the noise should be managed strictly by the Government, whereas other people claim that they don’t mind to any level of noise in their places. In this essay, these viewpoints surrounding this matter shall be examined in detail.
Those who support the idea that the Government should have some strict controls about noise believe that it creates some following benefits. The first advantage is protecting people’s hearing. According to a recent study, people who hear sounds more than 70dB for 2 hours every day will face the risk of deafness. The second one is the act of decreasing noise is the best way to save energy. The reason is that the louder sound was heard, the more electrical power was used. However, the fact has shown that it is difficult to deal with managing noise because of the lack of residents’ awareness.
Those who disagree with the mentioned – above idea think that noise does not influent anyone for some following reasons. One of the clear reasons is that the Government has not to spend much more money on strict law about managing noise. In fact, there are plenty of issues must be done for citizens such as enhancing healthcare systems, building schools and streets, etc. Another one is that people think they have the right to make as much noise as they can. A typical example is that all massive celebrations are usually held in wide places and they always want to turn on the biggest level of sound to have a good time together.
In a nutshell, noise does more harm than good, I am convinced that controlling the level of noise plays an essential role in people’s lives. The Government should have some strict policies to manage the effects of noise.
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to get a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The charts below show information about animals and rainfall at the Nboro Nature Reserve Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart shows the division of household tasks by gender in Great Britain.Write a report for a university lecture describing the information shown below. 78
- Nowadays older people who need employment have to compete with younger people What problems does this cause and what are the solutions 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1532.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7875 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48928171116 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55625 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4054410668 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5625 7.06120827912 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342168917165 0.244688304435 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103464035254 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0997663971655 0.0667982634062 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207476894631 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540252293607 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.