There is a controversial debate surrounding the knowledge and majors that universities teach students. Some people assert that universities should prepare students with regard to requirement demanded in workplaces. On the flip side, others claim that universities ought to provide information and skills for students that align with their own privilege no matter what employer are in need of. In my opinion, the idea of former party seems more reasonable since it would not only contribute to better employment condition, but would also bring benefits to communities.
Firstly, now, the things that bother more graduates is lack of the sufficient experiences and skills that are crucial to persuade employer in order to trust them. As a matter of the fact, it is the responsibility of universities regarding provision of adequate both theoretical and practical information that would guarantee their future job opportunities. For example, countries assimilate solely two or three credits of all countries. Therefore, something has to be done by government with respect to raising these sorts of courses in the light of the fact that abundance of them would result in more experiences prior to taking on a job.
Secondly, nowadays, nations are needy of adept and competence experts regarding improvement in industry and other careers. So this fact, urge universities as an vital character to bring up students in a way that result in positives impacts on their position in the future. For instance, the thesis supervisors in universities department define architectural or mechanical projects resemble the real one in industry. So graduates subsequently are ready to take over projects regardless of their difficulties.
Put it into a nutshell, it would be definitely wise if head of the education organization put programs into universities curriculum that would lead to having experienced youth capable of talking important projects in the workplaces. Not only would it result in to upside to graduates economically, but also it would cause never encountering with shortage of mentors in the industry and societies.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- 100 years ago people thought that human race was steadily making progress in all areas of life nowadays there is less certainty that is so In what areas do you think the most important progress has been made so far In what areas more things need to be don 92
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- In many countries, schools have severe problems with student behaviour. What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 11
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 159, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ers. So this fact, urge universities as an vital character to bring up students in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, of course, in my opinion, with regard to, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1796.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44242424242 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16112172208 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2567088108 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.285714286 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8571428571 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206286871113 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683698998661 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600484450377 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11650759464 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744937106668 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.